We should seriously discuss what kind of license we want to use. Currently we're using "Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike", but it would be good to discuss if this is truly the best license to use, or if there is possibly a better one. Honestly I don't know either way, I'm only saying that this decision should be gotten right early, because it will have very important long term implications.
Also, even if the current license is really the best one, it would be good and useful to have a discussion which explores and explains why it is the best one. ?! Wonderist 01:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
XC and I worked it out over the phone. Feel free to state an explicit objection. It matches the wiki license which is what you need if you use any of their content.--Brian 01:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)